The Ajusco case,based on twenty months of fieldwork completed over the course of a decade(1983-1993),documents the dynamics of community mobilization and the interactive politics of environmental regulation and popular resistance around ecological and land use issues.The case links the urban land question and the concept of sustainability to questions about livelihood opportunities and political mediation.The study advances one of the key arguments stressed during the 1992 World Conference on Environment and Development(Earth Summit) and the 1996 City Summit(Habitat Ⅱ): rising demands for healthy human settlements—including adequate housing,jobs,food,water,social justice,and equity—must be reconciled with the necessity to sustain the ecological foundations of life and industry.The Mexico City case clearly shows that efforts to meet such a far-reaching challenge must go beyond issues of urban management.Bottom-up pressure must be brought against the state so that planning for ecological sustainability can take into account the fact that human settlements are increasingly places for production and income generation as well as a places for consumption and reproduction.This challenge calls for community empowerment and,ultimately,for integrated approaches to sustainable development in urban and rural areas simultaneously—not just in the Valley of Mexco,but regionally and around the world.

熱心網友

Ajusco 事例, 根據二十個月fieldwork 完成在路線 decade(1983-1993), 提供社區動員動力學并且環境章程交互式政治 和普遍的抵抗在生態學和土地利用issues。The 案件附近連接都市土 地問題并且sustainability 的概念對問題關于生計機會和政治 mediation。The 研究提出關鍵論據的當中一個注重在關于環境的 1992 年其間世界會議和Development(Earth 山頂) 和1996 年城市 Summit(Habitat 。2o): 上升要求為健康人 settlements。。including 充分住房, 工作, 食物, 水, 社會正義 , 并且equity。。must 被和解與必要承受生活的生態學基礎并且 industry。The 墨西哥城案件展示努力接受這樣一廣遠挑戰必須超出 都市management。Bottom-up 壓力問題范圍必須清楚地被帶來反對這 個狀態所以計劃為生態學sustainability 可能考慮到這個事實人 解決愈來愈是地方為生產和收入世代并且地方為消耗量和 reproduction。This 挑戰呼號對社區empowerment 和, 最后, 對集 成方法對能承受發展在都市和鄉區simultaneously。。not 在Mexco 谷,。